/lounge/ - Lounge

Ultimate Manchildren's Playpen
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)


File: 1656880694632-0.mp4 (3.78 MB, 480x480, Papers.mp4)

File: 1656880694632-1.mp4 (11.12 MB, 854x480, Darwinism debunked.mp4)

 No.14159[View All]

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
>Science is facing a "reproducibility crisis" where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, research suggests.
>"It's worrying because replication is supposed to be a hallmark of scientific integrity,"

https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/stories/sciences-under-discussed-problem-with-confirmation-bias/
> Research scientists are under pressure to get published in the most prominent journals possible, and their chances increase considerably if they find positive (thus “impactful”) results. For journals, the appeal is clear, writes Philip Ball for Nautilus: they’ll make a bigger splash if they discover some new truth, rather than if they simply refuted old findings. The reality is that science rarely produces data so appealing.
> The quest for publication has led some scientists to manipulate data, analysis, and even their original hypotheses. In 2014, John Ioannidis, a Stanford professor conducting researching on research (or ‘meta-research’), found that across the scientific field, “many new proposed associations and/or effects are false or grossly exaggerated.” Ioannidis, who estimates that 85 percent of research resources are wasted, claims that the frequency of positive results well exceeds how often one should expect to find them

When did you realize that science is all about confirmation bias and mental gymnastics?
138 posts and 40 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.35782

>>35777
Trips

 No.35861

>>35781
They are called niggers, sir.

 No.37440

File: 1672593264797.mp4 (13.62 MB, 854x480, Jigaboos.mp4)

>>35861
Porch monkeys.

 No.37584

File: 1672620388908.jpg (88.05 KB, 750x912, https __pbs.twimg.jpg)

>>35861
how do u even call middle class millennial and zoomer white guys with aencyclopedic knowledge and adoration of all the iq 90 'lil scoon'-s and 'yung jigger'-s

 No.37757

>>37584
Self-hating oikophobes.

 No.39660

File: 1673229502336.jpg (35.79 KB, 510x540, Fl7S1dSacAEo6cc.jpg)


 No.39679

>>37584
Brainwashed.

 No.39694

>>37584
A h'White nigger once told me that rappers that can free-style are high-IQ geniuses. I assume brainlets believe that you must be really smart if you're well-practiced in anything.

 No.39703

File: 1673285628443.jpg (95.47 KB, 648x796, 1673211491910312.jpg)

>>39694
> I assume brainlets believe
..let people get their ego's stroked.

 No.39721

File: 1673293225642.png (413.9 KB, 727x700, 1673207032132986.png)


 No.39853

>>14159
>When did you realize that science is all about confirmation bias and mental gymnastics?
>all about
That's not true though.
When the science community (professors, students, universities, laboratories etc.) was much smaller and less commodified (19th and early 20th century) as well as public interest being not nearly as widespread it was still ideal.

Now that the public cares about "science", corporations can just pay the overabundance of "experts" to publish something in their favor to gain trust. Governments will do this too.
Funnily enough, OP is using the standards of empirical science to prove that they're a valuable asset instead of proving the opposite.

 No.39858

>>39853
Science is pretty much devoid of meaning today. It's just manipulative skewing.

 No.39959

File: 1673386292694.gif (3.1 MB, 600x450, SillyBlondDuckbillcat-size….gif)


 No.40069

>>39858
Soyence.

 No.40317

>>40069
Soyence is soyentific.

 No.40338

Sometimes I've thought about doing independent studies, but I know that probably nobody would read them or care, or whine about the data I'm able to collect with a limited budget.

 No.40339

>>40338
>limited budget
(you), take care of (you) first. Don't drain yourself of funds that (you) don't have. Support yourself FIRST!!! Everything else will fall into place. Keep tabs on stuff and do what you're able to.

 No.40428

>>40338
The thing about research is that it is time consuming. You can do it but it usually is tedious.

 No.41129

>>40428
The fedora tipper fears the independent researcher.

 No.41131

>>41129
Fedora tippers only listen to what Richard Dawkins think.

 No.41250

>>41131
People who obsess over science are usually autistic as fuck.

 No.41404

>>41250
This. The most awkward pseudo-intellectual spergs think science is an authority that applies to everything.

 No.41411

>>41250
Whats wrong with autists?

 No.41442

>>41411
People on the internet are mean.

 No.41501

>>41442
Do you have autism?

 No.41503

File: 1674159257717.png (1016.45 KB, 1440x1672, 1674075305745.png)

>>41501
Nope!

 No.41637

Relevant. I suggest skipping to 4:56.

 No.42159

File: 1674551397392.jpeg (27.4 KB, 502x417, 93E386EF-4D15-4A89-BB41-4….jpeg)

>>41411
>Whats wrong with autists?

 No.42162

>>42159
Nothing it was just a question, i am autistic

 No.42174

File: 1674560788153.gif (252.13 KB, 220x301, dog-sniff.gif)

>>42159
I've only met mean, vicious, nasty one's. I have built up a traumatic revulsion towards them. Gif related is me when I get word that someone has the tism,burgers, spectrum! Thanks 4chon!

 No.42227

>>42174
You will never experience the bliss of a wild bustling imagination, normal people like you are born of satan

 No.42255

>>42227
Satan is cool.

 No.42296

>>42255
You poor poor soul

 No.42312

>>42296
Your poor life.

 No.42316

>>42312
My life is beautiful

 No.42325

>>42316
Your vegetable brother is in heaven vomiting all over himself 24/7!

 No.42329

>>42325
I am not Smiley! I am curious though as to how you came to such a conclusion, is it the literate nature of my posts?

Infact dont answer me son of kane, you arent worth talking to about anything

 No.42331

>>42329
Smiley put down the crack pipe lol.

 No.42345

>>42331
Are you going to continue to deflect?

 No.42347

>>42345
Deflect from h'what?

 No.42358

>>42347
The fact that i stated that i wasnt this person you are talking about

 No.42362

>>42358
nigger

 No.42494

File: 1674726583373.gif (2.55 MB, 480x360, autism.gif)


 No.42560


 No.42564

>>42560
Pretty much every poster on 4chan.

 No.42594

>>42564
The only people posting on cuckchan anymore are feds and AI.

 No.42595

>>42594
Why so NEL bro?

 No.42606

>>42595
NEL is all I know.

 No.42610

>>42606
Sadge

 No.42883

File: 1675151921928.jpg (2.26 MB, 3008x2000, DSC_0015.JPG)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415937/
>Basic philosophical assumptions count as biases because they skew the development of hypotheses, the design of experiments, the evaluation of evidence, and the interpretation of results in specific directions.
>Philosophical biases are typically acquired from science education, professional practice or other disciplinary traditions that define a scientific paradigm. This is why scientists with varying backgrounds might adopt different philosophical biases.

Occam’s Razor, as an example of philosophical bias, shows that scientists tend to conform to a certain way of thinking. Simple answers are easy to digest and scientists always choose easy solutions. Consensus is the rule they all follow. Science isn't objective, it's portrayed as objective.



[Return] [Catalog] [Top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]