I was just searching google for "best pictures of hitler" and this one came in 3rd, it was attached to this articlehttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-37315118I was hoping to find pictures of the contest winner, does anyone here ever remember seei

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Namem?VB3Y<j5#x(nDtcy☂⚊)]⚎9.24eIL$/^_S\b8C1u@&q ⛂rvG+>!khzU~⚐p= N0KHf♖
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1610183229147.jpg (114.38 KB, 1024x576, _91053750_gettyimages-3287….jpg)

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 09:07:09 No.8948

I was just searching google for "best pictures of hitler" and this one came in 3rd, it was attached to this article
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-37315118
I was hoping to find pictures of the contest winner, does anyone here ever remember seeing pics of the contest winner? Its from five years ago

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 09:09:40 No.8949

File: 1610183380320.jpg (239.18 KB, 892x640, time-100-influential-photo….jpg)

>>8948
That one is Google's 3rd ranked best picture of Hitler,

← this is the 2nd place

and the champion of all pictures of Hitler, according to Google is…

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 09:09:50 No.8950

File: 1610183390736.jpg (113.93 KB, 748x1080, heinrich-hoffmann-hitler-n….jpg)

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 09:12:06 No.8951

Google's selection of images was surprisingly good given that they're kikes, there weren't any disrespectful ones until 17th place, which was Charlie Chaplin.

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 09:17:58 No.8952

I'm not completely convinced that Hitler ever even existed, it seems like maybe he is just a figment of the holohoax. That seems like the most reasonable explanation of why Google has such a nice selection of Hitler pics. Where would the kikes be without their eternal boogeyman? They have to promote the Hitler rumor or their land grab in the levant is unjustified.

Anonymous 01/09/21 (Sat) 13:00:41 No.8954

>>8952
>When the salvia kicks in