>>111017>And yes, itâs a tragedy, but nature spews out life, all the time, and some are destroyed, and others move towards the sunThe heart of the issue here is probability and risk management. R vs K selection. In sea turtle reproduction the vast majority of hatchlings die horrendous deaths on their first day of life. If a man's theoretical offspring faced such odds -that is 99% of his children are fated to die in horrid ways as young children- that man should not reproduce and subject livings beings to such horrors
The problem in this thread is that a sick man (
>>110869) that literally refers to himself as "mindbroken" (
>>110929) is recommending to other sick and "mindbroken" men that their mental problems can be solved by having a child
>nature spews out life, all the time, and some are destroyed, and others move towards the sun. And in terms of probability do you believe the children of these men will destroyed or "move towards the sun?". In my own opinion only the healthy and therefore happy should be reproducing, as a bare minimum requirement
