/lounge/ - Lounge

>>90460
Heh I eat with my hands like a troglodyte.

>>90467
noone cares, shut the fuck up faggot

>>90470
Sorry if I derailed the thread, I have a habit of typing too much and giving TMI like Smiley.

>>90471
You're fine. You'll get used to taking a beating here and grow a thick skin. If not... don't make yourself identifiable and find some place better suited. This is not a hugbox, unfortunately.

>>90472
Thanks, but what makes you think I'd want to be in a hugbox? Flirting with evil and danger is far more interesting than being around normie cattle.

>>90472
>>90475
kill yourselves

>>90475
Whatever floats your boat.

>>90476
After (you).

>>90479
great now stay on topic you niggerfaggot

now if you'll excuse me i have some dark chocolate to suck on tonight if you know what i mean ;)

>>90467
hey you sound like an expert, help me learn to cook so i can win the hearts and minds of my african partn- errr, friends, who stay over so they don't ghost me just because i stink a little bit down there if i don't fast and use an enema

>>90467
>>90488
...i'm thinking something along the lines of big brown juicy sausages would do, or something similar, what do you think?

>>90467
god i wanna hear some ideas from you for obtaining delicious brown wieners

>>90479
>not giving a fuck about public humiliation
this advice helped me with making some african friends at the nearby gay bar

>>90509
she got rizz and five star gyatt

don't hate, masturbate, maybe shoot your shot and copulate

>>90461
I eat for sustenance, not pleasure

>>90546
I bet you're real fun at parties.

>>90537
avid just seethe gooning cuz fanum dont taxed his ohio L bussy yet frfr ong

Not trying to defend factory husbandry (I do think it is an insanely villainous crime against nature and I don't think meat should be as plentiful as it currently is), but the snobbery of some vegans irritates me. They believe they are protesting the contribution to universal suffering by having picky diets. This presupposes that plants are unfeeling beings. Hell, many people (i.e. not specifically vegans) even try to say arthropods cannot conceive what pain is because their nervous systems are somehow significantly different from mammals. I firmly believe that both these kinds of life do intensely feel since they exhibit strong protests to negative stimuli.

I think, so long as you want to survive, you will necessarily be inflicting suffering upon another being. Even the plants are potentially guilty. So invertebrates and flora are considered incapable of being hurt, but it's even more true of minerals. It probably seems ridiculous to propose that even minerals might possess life (they do share some properties associated with life), but it seems the "official" human conception of feeling is already so flawed to deny that bugs and plants understand pain that perhaps our definition as to what constitutes living is as well. Who knows?

Anyway, a diet based on morality seems stupid to me. Just try to avoid consuming stuff that will damage your body. A diet most consistently adhering to morals as possible would be suicide by starvation, but even that has its own caveat in inflicting suffering upon the billions of individual cell lives that constitute the whole. The self is contained within a very small region of the brain regardless of its assertiveness.

tldr diet choices have no impact on suffering at large because the bottom line is that life is always sustained by the consumption of other life. It's all a competition.

>>90577
literally obsessed

>>90665
>tldr diet choices have no impact on suffering at large because the bottom line is that life is always sustained by the consumption of other life
There are ways of consumption that minimize suffering (ethical farming, hunting) and ways that maximize suffering (factory farming). The former is always superior to the latter

>the snobbery of some vegans irritates me
Veganism is a trap for midwits. Both the stupid and intelligent can gaze upon a vegan, see their sickly, decaying body and understand immediately that veganism is wrong

Humans need quality protein, saturated fat and cholesterol. Plants are unable to provide any of these in sufficient quantity or quality

I met a vegan not long ago, a sickly liberal woman, with a young boy aged 5 (named Strider) that she had forced to be vegan. This delusional female creates immense suffering with her self-righteous delusion

The average human is truly of less moral character than any wildlife

I'm a punk rocker chef. I got tattoos and a meth addiction. I don't take shit from civies. The kitchen is a war zone and I'm Pol Pot. You want me to hold the mayo? KILL YOURSELF

>>90706
eating at mcdicks and taco smell for the rest of my life to avoid giving this kind of person my money

>>90716
Why not cook your own food and deny both the sloppers and the cokeheads your money

>>90805
Uh, gay?

>>90835
Just the way avid likes it.

i want chicken nurgets

cooking thread with webm spam of trash meals and no actual discussions of meals that you retards have cooked

might aswell rename 4chon to off offtopic because every thread is derailed by the goblin and foky spamming zero discussion garbage, what a joke

>>90949
Please show us how it's done, chef avid: the dirty 30 year old scubber who to this day still has stacks of filthy, used plates all over his bedroom floor lol

>>90948
Get 'em!

>>90951
>the dirty 30 year old scubber who to this day still has stacks of filthy, used plates all over his bedroom floor lol

I'm not 30 and I'm tidy, you skitzo cunt

>>90948
Same tbh.

Sardines over potatoes is really good.

>>91033
Mashed potatoes are bland.

>>91068
Hogetara post.

>>91070
weeaboo retard

>>91075
BBC sissy post.

>>91075
who is this beautiful woman?

>>91259
That's avid in drag.

>>91271
dayum! might have to paint my dick black and see if he'll suck it

>>91415
You don't have to worry. He'll suck it. He always does.

>>91432
>>91431
I'm glad avid is being more inclusive and sucking all types of willies now!

>>91445
He always has but he loves bbc the most.

>bugs are a sustainable superfood gringo
This hasn't been proven at all. The demand for bug protein doesn't remotely approach that of traditional meat industries. It's dwarved a few dozen times over even by the plant protein market. There is absolutely no proof that bugs are better for the environment because the demand to test their sustainability doesn't exist. Even in regions where bugs are easy to locate at market, a lot of people refuse to eat them. I wonder what the impact on emissions would be from lynching all these privileged freaks born with silver spoons up their asses so they can't traffick around and rape sex slaves/future organ harvests on their private jets and superyachts daily.

Truth is there are too many people on the planet, in particular too many worthless eaters having more kids than they can manage to feed themselves (niggers, spics and indians being the major culprits). I still don't believe that the consumption of meat should be abolished, but reductions to its availability and the amount of consumers seem like they could go far in slowing or reversing ecological damage.

Also worth adding, each of the three demographics I mentioned that are likely causing the most ecological damage already practice the consumption of bugs to some extent.