>>109234 Your corrected versions had a meaning that was different from my intended meaning.
To convey my intended meaning using only "and" and "or" rather than "/" seems to require lengthy, awkward constructions like:
"A": "You were being petulant or doomerist or both. People in power view petulant doomerism as a threat or hazard or liability or as both a threat and hazard or both a threat and liability or both a hazard and liability or as a threat, hazard, and liability."
"B": "You were being at least one of "petulant" and "doomerist." People in power view petulant doomerism as one, two or three of "threat," "hazard," and "liability "
Have fun articulating the difference in meaning between the following and the variant labeled "A":
"You were being petulant or doomerist or both. People in power view petulant doomerism as a threat or hazard or as a liability or both a threat and hazard or both a threat and liability or both a hazard and liability or as a threat, hazard, and liability "
