No.4700
>White House calls explicit AI-generated Taylor Swift images 'alarming,' urges Congress to act
A guy on youtube sez that postmodernism is characterized by endless production of self-referential cultural products, forming a hyper-reality, a picture-reality detached from physical reality, facts & logics & nature.
Somebody has to have a grip on that. Consumers are supposed see celebs put in front of them that are the material of centrally planned persuasive culture products as idealized godforms to lust over and gossip a'bout, instead of lashing out.
I wonder if idea of some prole, anyone, being able to generate same kinds of persuasive indulgent gooncave muhdik etc. culture products, but away from the "old media" morbillion dollar centralized production chain and it's programming is seen as a long-term treat (e.g. breakdown of social morale, goon cults outside of gov. control, forms of retarded extremism, being directed by external adversaries like chyna).
Think dey may not be interested protecting the "Taylor Swift" the person, but the copyrighted idealized godform owned and utilized by the corporation by the government, from generative AI becoming their competition.
>watcha doin dere you stupid proles ain't supposed to be putting 'er in a smut video just like 'at
No.4760
>>4700can they acktually make it illegal? i know states passed "revenge porn" laws
No.4781
>>4760>>4772They're amending copyright law which is very American. It's not a morality law like in some Muslim countries or China. Pornography is one of the only remaining things Americans produce and export besides weapons, drugs and movies so they won't want to hurt this industry.
No.4816
Reported for offtopic
