>>5724So at first I thought they weren't saying anything due to conventional terror motive. Now, I understand that they want to spin a PR narrative that makes it seem like this person did not 'snap', have a psychotic break, and that he did not have access to hard drugs than law enforcement would like. It's very clear he basically was resentful he could not lead a normal life, with a normal family and job, and took it out on women.
If 'sex work' were harshly criminalised, and narcotics were also, this would not happen. Basically, they're trying to make it look like the country where
half the adult population has less than $1000 in their bank accounts is not collapsing and hasn't gone to shit.
