No.6795
>>6791Me an' my homies are gonna roll up on yo' math cuck bitch-asses and bust a cap. You can count dem bullets, nigga.
No.7020
Unironically though, the problem with math is how information is presented. Unless you've seen similar problems before, you have to decipher the hidden code of the esoteric math cult if you want to solve an equation. Let's take (f+g)(-3) where f(x)=x-4 and g(x)=x-6. Pretend you've never seen a problem like this before. The 13 years of public education would probably lead you to believe you solve it like this: ((x-4)+(x-6))(-3) ->(2x-10)-3 ->6x-30, when in fact you're supposed to just plug in -3 for x, so it's -16. Any other time in your life you would have distributed that -3, it's in parentheses after all, but the math pope has decreed otherwise in this case. It shits all over the deductive reasoning skills that math is allegedly supposed to build upon by breaking the patterns you've been taught your entire life. We suffer because hoity toity fags, who smell their own farts can't figure out how to communicate information effectively. It turns something that should be incredibly simple into a confusing game where you're constantly second-guessing yourself, hoping you didn't forget whatever asinine rule they came up with to solve the specific problem you're working on.
No.9663
>>9661Fuk yo ass, raciss' cracka!