>>68185Maybe but I don't think that really applies to political action. Many drugs make people disinhibited but that is not exactly going to turn them into revolutionaries or even violent actors.
>>68333Those are good points, especially that if people are known drug users they can be targetted by police for raids.
I follow some news on drug arrests and cops seem to go after manufacturers and/or suppliers and/or darknet hosts. But I'm not sure at all of the how, when and why and otherwise the logic behind this. I mean the various authorities seem to push drugs whilst also sometimes, in a way that I don't understand, come down hard on the suppliers etc. Maybe its just to shake things up and not let any one group or entity get too much power or control.
I don't know about the idea that hallucinogens can inspire revolutionary action. Jews and/or elite groups pushed psychedelics in the 60s to psyop the hippie movement into support mass immigration and open borders etc, but that was all done by the 80s. Nothing like that happens now afaik. Some psychedelic users - hippies, ravers, homos etc, go to festivals or raves and get high and probably be promiscuous but I don't think that culture is even very big anymore.
